Employment liability and what does it all mean?

You’ve caused your employer millions of dollars in damages and now you’re worried about where you’re going to get the money? You can rest easy. An employee is only limitedly liable for damages caused to the employer. To what extent and what are the limitations on that liability?

Prodavačka leží na zemi a drží si zraněné koleno
7 minutes of reading

What about damage caused intentionally or after quenching thirst with a hoppy drink during working hours? Can the employer agree with the employee in advance to pay for the damage? And in which case is the employee liable for compensation?

TheLabour Code always refers to the employee and the employer in relation to liability. However, do not be confused by this, as an employee is also considered to be a natural person who concludes a work performance agreement with the employer. Therefore, compensation is not excluded in this case either.

As mentioned above, the employee is only liable for damage caused to the employer to a limited extent. It must always be damage caused culpably and in connection with the performance of work.

For example, if an employee inadvertently knocks over an important fibre-optic cable on a construction site, his employer must pay the victim the full amount of the damage and, if applicable, the loss of earnings. However, the employee can only recover a maximum of 4.5 times his average monthly wage, no matter how high the damage is.

If the employer also caused the damage, the employee shall only pay a proportionate part of the damage according to the degree of his fault. If more than one employee is liable for the damage, each of them shall bear a proportionate part of the damage according to the degree of his or her fault.

Further exceptions are provided for in agreements governing so-called material liability or liability for entrusted objects. These are discussed below.

But how is the amount of damages that the employer can claim calculated? Damage in the Labour Code regime is the actual diminution of the property of the employer to whom the damage has been caused.

Thus, for example, it is possible for an employer to claim from an employee the cost of repairing damaged machinery or equipment, but only if such costs would not have been incurred by the employer – but for the harmful event. For example, if a maintenance worker regularly comes to repair the machine in question, then the employer cannot claim the cost of that maintenance worker from the employee.

Tip: In its ruling, the Constitutional Court addressed the relationship between damage and the obligation to pay damages by the employee. It addressed the situation whether a botched organisational change at the workplace and several invalid terminations submitted on the basis of that change should be treated as one or several errors. This has an impact on the application of the limit on damages.

However, it is not always that simple and there are some exceptions. For example, the four and a half times limitation does not apply if the damage was caused intentionally, while drunk, or after the use of other addictive substances (e.g. marijuana). However, the employer must prove this. This can be done, for example, by calling witnesses from the “wet district” when the employee admits to his colleagues in the evening after his shift that he cut the cable on purpose in order to “embarrass” the employer. In that case, the employee is then liable for the full amount of the damage.

On the other hand, the employee is not liable for the damage he causes in the course of averting damage to the employer or a danger to life or limb which is imminent, if he did not intentionally create the condition and acted in a manner reasonable in the circumstances. However, increased caution is also recommended here. The employee has a duty to protect the employer’s property. Thus, if, for example, an employee rushing home saw strange smoke above the lumber store and did nothing, did not report it, but only mentioned it in the pub in the evening, the employer could indirectly blame him for the damage caused by the fire (here he is liable up to three and a half times his average monthly earnings).

Solutions Tailored for You

Our team of experienced attorneys will help you solve any legal issue. Within 24 hours we’ll evaluate your situation and suggest a step-by-step solution, including all costs. The price for this proposal is only CZK 690, and this is refunded to you when you order service from us.

Damage caused by employees

Theemployer is alsoliable for any damage that may be caused to an employee in the course of his or her work or by some other intentional act. Similarly, it is liable for damage caused to an employee by other employees acting on behalf of the employer in breach of legal obligations. An exception is damage to a means of transport used by the employee in the performance of his/her duties without the employer’s consent. The same shall apply to tools, equipment and articles of the employee necessary for the performance of the work used without the consent of the employer.

However, the employer shall also be liable to the employee for damage to items normally brought to work and left by the employee in the performance of his/her work tasks. However, the employee must exercise the right to compensation no later than 15 days from the date on which he became aware of the damage.

Tip: Are you an employee and liable for damages? Take out an employee liability insurance policy, or crap insurance. Find out how it works in our article.

An interesting case was settled by the court some time ago, involving the theft of a car from an employee who used it as usual to get to work and parked it on the employer’s premises. She put the car keys along with other personal belongings in the assigned locker in the locker room used for changing clothes. It was ransacked. The court held that, for purposes of employer liability for damages caused by the removed items, a personal automobile cannot be considered an item customarily brought to work. An employee is only liable for a personal car that she places on the employer’s premises in an unattended parking lot up to the amount of £10,000, unless the damage to the car was caused by another employee.

Tip: Road accidents are one of the most common situations in which we deal with compensation, whether as the injured party or as the person who caused the damage. What are the relationships between the parties involved and how does the insurance company get involved? What can you claim and how to proceed in such situations?

The employer is obliged to reimburse the employee for the actual damage. In the case of abandoned items, if the employee brings to work items that he does not normally wear and the employer does not take them into special custody, the employer shall be liable for damages up to CZK 10,000. That was the case with the car in question. If it is established that the damage to the item was caused by another employee or that the item was damaged in the employer’s special custody, the employer is also liable to pay the employee the full amount of the damage. However, it is not enough to have a doorman at the entrance to the premises or cameras at the workplace. That does not count as special custody.

However, if the employee does not report the damage to the employer without undue delay within 15 days of the date on which he became aware of the damage, this right to compensation is extinguished.

Tip: Have you had an accident at work? What are you entitled to, what is pain and suffering and how is it determined? Is the procedure different if you caused the injury in part by your own breach of duty? And why is your employer allowed to give you notice in connection with an accident at work? We answer all this in our article.

Are you solving a similar problem?

Dostupný advokát team of online lawyers will solve it for you.

Solutions Tailored for You

Our team of experienced attorneys will help you solve any legal issue. Within 24 hours we’ll evaluate your situation and suggest a step-by-step solution, including all costs. The price for this proposal is only CZK 690, and this is refunded to you when you order service from us.

Preset Prices
All services pre-priced for no surprises.
We Do Everything Online
Save time, money and the hassle of travel.
We Work Fast
90 % of issues get solved by the following day.
Experienced Team
We have specialists for every field of law.

Has this content helped you? Give it a rating

No rating yet. Be first to rate and help others.

Author of the article

JUDr. Ondřej Preuss, Ph.D.

Ondřej is the attorney who came up with the idea of providing legal services online. He's been earning his living through legal services for more than 10 years. He especially likes to help clients who may have given up hope in solving their legal issues at work, for example with real estate transfers or copyright licenses.

Education
  • Law, Ph.D, Pf UK in Prague
  • Law, L’université Nancy-II, Nancy
  • Law, Master’s degree (Mgr.), Pf UK in Prague
  • International Territorial Studies (Bc.), FSV UK in Prague

Reviews of the Dostupný advokát service

Recenze služby

Ms Magic, Google reviews

Fast and professional solutions for most normal legal needs at affordable, preset prices. Seriously, what could be better than that? While it sounds ‘too good to be true,’ I’m happy to report that the staff at DA are pros, and what’s more they are honestly dedicated to their awesome mission, which is to make quality Fast and professional solutions for most normal legal needs at affordable, preset prices. Seriously, what could be better than that? While it sounds ‘too good to be true,’ I’m happy to report that the staff at DA are pros, and what’s more they are honestly dedicated to their awesome mission, which is to make quality legal services affordable for the average person. I find their prices very fair when compared to what I’ve usually paid for similar services, which means I (and my family and friends) can get the legal help I need without worrying about some black hole of never-ending fees. In my own experience with DA I’ve found everyone there very responsive, and emails and calls are answered in a timely manner. Their large staff also gives me confidence that any legal needs I have can be handled professionally, as there’s always someone with experience in my particular issue. Their head attorney also writes a regular blog and keeps up with all the latest legal trends, which means they as a business stay up-to-date. As someone who’s spent a fortune over the years on legal assistance, or tried to “go it alone” when I couldn’t afford legal help, I wish Dostupny Advokat had been around a long time ago. I highly encourage anyone who needs legal help to TRY THEM FIRST!

Recenze služby
Economist

Jan Sekanina, Prague

My grandparents wanted to give me an apartment, but I was extremely busy at the time and couldn’t afford to put any time into finding out what I needed to do. I also had no idea how to get the transfer of ownership handled at the Land Registry. Dostupný advokát arranged everything for me, and the apartment transfer was legally arranged with no issues. Thank you and thumbs up!

Recenze služby
representative for HVFree s.r.o.

Štěpán Mičunek, Vsetín district

I contacted Dostupný advokát because I needed help with a non-payer. Dostupný advokát gave me advice on how to proceed. The dispute became a court issue, where I was represented by Dostupný advokát. I won the court case and I can fully recommend their service.

View All Testimonials

You could also be interested in

About us in public media
Logo Česká advokátní komora Logo Advokátní kancelář roku 2023 a 2024
Follow the news
Facebook Dostupný advokát Twitter / X Dostupný advokát