Logo Advokátní kancelář roku 2023

Offences by entrepreneurs and legal persons

The former distinction between misdemeanours and administrative offences of legal persons is now a thing of the past. The current legislation has simplified and clarified this area. As a result, we have now seen the unification of all these categories under the single term ‘offence’. However, it is still the case that offences can also be committed by natural persons and legal entities. Which offences are involved?

znečistění řeky, přestupek právnické osoby
8 minutes of reading

Chapters of the article

Liability of a legal person for an offence

Legal persons are granted legal personality from their creation until their dissolution. During this period, a legal person may perform legal acts, acquire rights and obligations and act unlawfully. The liability of a legal person for an offence is conceived as strict liability. This is a significant difference from the liability of a natural (non-business) person and means that fault is not considered here.

Tip: What is an offence, what are its features, when can a natural person who is not an entrepreneur be an offender? We have discussed this in more detail in our blog article.

Liability of a legal person for an offence therefore arises if the following conditions are met:

  • there is a breach of an obligation imposed by law on the legal person,
  • the obligation is breached by a natural person whose conduct is attributable to the legal person,
  • the breach of the obligation occurs in the course of the activities of the legal person, in direct connection with its activities, for the benefit of the legal person or in its interest.

Have you received a fine or summons?

The penalties can be high and it is not worth going through the process without consulting or being represented by a lawyer. Careful reasoning also pays off if you want to draw attention to someone else’s offence.

1) Breach of an obligation imposed on a legal person

The offences that apply to legal persons are either directly stated in the law in this way, i.e. in the sense of “a legal person commits an offence by…”, or the obligation is imposed by the law in general, but may also apply to a legal person, which usually follows from other provisions of the law.

2) Conduct attributable to a legal person

Conduct attributable to a legal person means the conduct of certain natural persons who are responsible for either the management or the operation of the legal person. At the same time, however, it is not necessary to know their identity; it is not examined whether the conduct was culpable or not.

Example: under the Consumer Protection Act, a seller commits an offence by failing to indicate the destination and date of delivery on the proof of purchase of a product in the case of a sale with subsequent delivery. If the insufficient document is secured in this way, the employee who issued it is not identified for the purposes of punishing the offence. A fine may be imposed only on the basis that it is apparent that the document was issued by the legal person concerned. Whether an internal investigation is subsequently carried out and, for example, the employee’s liability for damages is inferred from the situation is completely irrelevant to the offence.

Similar examples could be the serving of alcohol to minors in a restaurant, etc.

The Misdemeanour Act provides an exhaustive list of persons whose conduct is imputable to a legal person for the purposes of misdemeanour law. This is a rather broad list, which includes the following persons:

  • a statutory body or a member of a statutory body,
  • another body of the legal person or a member thereof,
  • an employee or a person in a similar position in the performance of tasks arising from that position,
  • anatural person who performs the tasks of a legal person – the performance of a task is to be understood as ‘any task undertaken on the basis of instructions from a legal person (e.g. an employer), even if the instruction is an instruction encouraging a breach of a legal norm,
  • anatural person used by a legal person in the course of its activities, or
  • a natural person who has acted on behalf of the legal person, if the legal person has benefited from the result of such action.

3) The breach of duty occurred in the course of the activities of the legal person

The breach of duty occurred in the course of the activities of the legal person, in direct connection with the activities of the legal person or for the benefit of the legal person or in its interest.

In contrast to the previous case, we can imagine a situation where a managing director of a company commits a traffic offence in his personal car and at his leisure, which is in no way related to the activities of the legal person. He will therefore be liable for it as a natural person.

All of the above conditions must be met for the liability of a legal person to arise.

Tip: How do the offence proceedings work? How does it differ from criminal proceedings and why is it worth being represented by a lawyer? We have described everything in detail in our article.

Concurrent liability of a legal and natural person for an offence

The Act on Misdemeanours introduces an interesting concept of concurrent liability, according to which separate proceedings can be conducted on the liability of a legal entity and a natural person for the same offence. This is not a violation of the principle of double punishment for one act, precisely because the subject is different each time.

However, a legal person may be exonerated from liability for an offence if it proves that it made all the efforts that could be required of it to prevent the offence. As an example, in the explanatory memorandum, the legislator mentioned various preventive measures, training and inspections of employees.

Liability of a natural person in business for an offence

An entrepreneurial natural person can typically be thought of as a sole trader or a natural person in a similar position. Liability is again (as with a legal person) conceived as objective, i.e. irrespective of fault. It is therefore irrelevant whether the offence was committed intentionally or negligently. This is the fundamental difference between the assessment of offences committed by natural persons engaged in business and those not engaged in business.

The following conditions must be met:

  • there is a breach of an obligation imposed by law on a natural person in business or on a natural person in general – it is not necessary that the law imposes the obligation on the natural person in business in the first place,
  • the obligation is breached by a natural person whose conduct is attributable to the natural person in business,
  • the breach of the obligation occurs in the course of the activities of the natural person carrying on business, in direct connection with his activities, for the benefit of the natural person carrying on business or in his interests – at this stage it is crucial whether the activities of the natural person carrying on business are involved. Similarly to a legal person, a sole trader may commit, for example, disturbing the peace during a private party. In such a case, however, the conduct is not ‘acting in the course of the business of a natural person’, so he would be liable as an ordinary natural person and culpability would have to be proved.

Theoretically, we can also imagine a situation where a sole trader has committed an act which has the characteristics of a natural person offence, but outside the context of his business. However, the law regulates the relevant facts exclusively for natural entrepreneurs. In such a case, an act committed by a natural person engaged in business outside the context of his business would not be punishable.

A person whose conduct is attributable to an entrepreneurial person is deemed to be a person under the Offences Act:

  • an employee or a person in a similar position in the performance of the tasks arising from that position,
  • a natural person who performs the tasks of a natural person engaged in business;
  • a natural person used by an entrepreneurial natural person in the course of his or her business;
  • a natural person who has acted on behalf of the natural person in business, if the natural person in business has benefited from the result of such action.

An entrepreneurial natural person shall not be liable for an offence if he proves that he has made all the efforts that could be required of him to prevent the offence.

Circumstances precluding unlawfulness

As in the case of natural (non-business) persons, circumstances precluding unlawfulness may apply to business persons and legal persons. These include necessary defence, extreme necessity, the consent of the injured party, the legitimate use of a weapon, and permissible risk.

Are you solving a similar problem?

Dostupný advokát team of online lawyers will solve it for you.

Representation in misdemeanour proceedings

Have you received a penalty or summons? The penalties can be high and it is not worth going through the process without consulting an attorney. Careful reasoning also pays off if you want to draw attention to someone else’s offence.

Preset Prices
All services pre-priced for no surprises.
We Do Everything Online
Save time, money and the hassle of travel.
We Work Fast
90 % of issues get solved by the following day.
Experienced Team
We have specialists for every field of law.

Has this content helped you? Give it a rating

No rating yet. Be first to rate and help others.

Author of the article

JUDr. Ondřej Preuss, Ph.D.

Ondřej is the attorney who came up with the idea of providing legal services online. He's been earning his living through legal services for more than 10 years. He especially likes to help clients who may have given up hope in solving their legal issues at work, for example with real estate transfers or copyright licenses.

Education
  • Law, Ph.D, Pf UK in Prague
  • Law, L’université Nancy-II, Nancy
  • Law, Master’s degree (Mgr.), Pf UK in Prague
  • International Territorial Studies (Bc.), FSV UK in Prague

Reviews of the Dostupný advokát service

Recenze služby

Tomáš Hrdlička, Nové Strašecí

before 3 years

I felt very uncomfortable meeting an attorney in person. But Dostupný advokát managed to solve everything for me online. I bought a consultation because my employer had sent me for a long term business trip to an exotic country with no explanation, and I wanted to be sure what my rights in this situation were. (zobrazit více) The Skype consultation was very pleasant and the service was fast. I can fully recommend them.

Recenze služby

Ms Magic, Google reviews

before 3 years

Fast and professional solutions for most normal legal needs at affordable, preset prices. Seriously, what could be better than that? While it sounds ‘too good to be true,’ I’m happy to report that the staff at DA are pros, and what’s more they are honestly dedicated to their awesome mission, which is to make quality (zobrazit více) Fast and professional solutions for most normal legal needs at affordable, preset prices. Seriously, what could be better than that? While it sounds ‘too good to be true,’ I’m happy to report that the staff at DA are pros, and what’s more they are honestly dedicated to their awesome mission, which is to make quality legal services affordable for the average person. I find their prices very fair when compared to what I’ve usually paid for similar services, which means I (and my family and friends) can get the legal help I need without worrying about some black hole of never-ending fees. In my own experience with DA I’ve found everyone there very responsive, and emails and calls are answered in a timely manner. Their large staff also gives me confidence that any legal needs I have can be handled professionally, as there’s always someone with experience in my particular issue. Their head attorney also writes a regular blog and keeps up with all the latest legal trends, which means they as a business stay up-to-date. As someone who’s spent a fortune over the years on legal assistance, or tried to “go it alone” when I couldn’t afford legal help, I wish Dostupny Advokat had been around a long time ago. I highly encourage anyone who needs legal help to TRY THEM FIRST!

Recenze služby

Pavel Kasal

before 3 years

I decided to withdraw from my operating lease prematurely and was charged a ridiculously high penalty, apparently because the car had been sold for a significantly lower price than its market value. I found it frustrating, so I turned to Dostupný advokát for help. They got to work on the case very fast and recommended (zobrazit více) several options on how to proceed. They also helped me prepare all necessary documentation. Thanks to them, I had to pay only a fraction of the original amount and saved tens of thousands of Crowns.

View All Testimonials

You could also be interested in

About us in public media
Logo Česká advokátní komora Logo Advokátní kancelář roku 2023
Follow the news
Facebook Dostupný advokát Twitter / X Dostupný advokát