Supreme Court of the Czech Republic: functioning and case law

The Supreme Court stands at the top of the imaginary pyramid of our judicial system. Parties turn to it when all else fails. Its important role, however, lies primarily in the fact that its decisions create a kind of template, according to which all the lower courts then decide. In this article, we look at exactly what the Supreme Court does, how it is structured and how it decides.

8 minutes of reading

Chapters of the article

What the Supreme Court does

In order to understand the work of the Supreme Court, we must first take a brief look at the court system. It is an imaginary pyramid, the base of which is formed by the district and regional courts, which rule at first instance. At the top of the pyramid are the high courts (or regional courts if the first instance decision was made by a district court), which decide on appeals against decisions of district and regional courts, and at the very top of the pyramid is the Supreme Court, which decides on extraordinary appeals, i.e. appeals and complaints for breach of law.

An appeal is an extraordinary remedy available to challenge a final decision of the Court of Appeal. Only the Minister of Justice may lodge a complaint against a breach of the law if he suspects that a final decision of a court or prosecutor is unlawful.

You therefore appeal to the Supreme Court if you have unsuccessfully appealed to the court of second instance, i.e. to the regional court if the district court ruled at first instance or to the High Court if the regional court ruled at first instance.

Has the court ruled against you and do you want to fight it?

We will assess your chances of success and take care of the preparation of the appeal or appeal depending on the proceedings and the stage they are at.

Another important function is to unify case law. It ensures that lower courts decide the same case in the same way. This process is important for achieving a uniform and consistent legal interpretation within the legal system. Another of its responsibilities is to collect and audit notifications of the activities, assets, income, gifts and liabilities of all judges in the Czech Republic.

The Supreme Court also decides on the determination of local jurisdiction in the judiciary, recognition of foreign judgments, authorization of the transit of a person on the basis of a European Arrest Warrant, review of interception orders, and in doubts about the exemption from the jurisdiction of law enforcement authorities.

Tip: We have discussed the system of courts in the Czech Republic in detail in another article.

Structure of the Supreme Court

The number of Supreme Court judges is around 70. The structure of the Supreme Court is made up of two colleges according to their area of activity: the Civil College and the Commercial and Criminal Colleges. Judgments are then made by the grand chambers of the colleges, the three-judge chambers and the collegium.

The Grand Chambers of the Colleges are composed of at least nine judges of the relevant College. They rule in situations where a panel of the Supreme Court reaches a legal opinion that differs from a legal opinion already expressed in a decision of the Supreme Court.

The three-member chambers are composed of the President of the Chamber and two judges. They decide mainly on appeals, complaints for breach of law, recognition and enforceability of decisions of foreign courts in the territory of the Czech Republic and in the field of criminal law.

The entire chambers are responsible for ensuring the legality and uniformity of court decisions. They observe and evaluate the decisions of the courts and forward the information found to the President of the Supreme Court for consideration. They also decide which court decisions will be included in the Collection of Court Decisions and Opinions.

The Supreme Court also meets as a full court. All the judges, the President and the Vice-President are present. The Plenary mainly discusses the Rules of Procedure of the Supreme Court.

The judges of the Supreme Court

The Supreme Court consists of the President of the Court, the Vice-Presidents of the Court, the Presidents of the Chambers and other judges. The President and the Vice-Presidents are in charge of the administration of the Supreme Court, the Presidents of the Colleges direct the activities of the Colleges , and the Presidents of the Chambers direct the activities of the Senate.

A citizen of the Czech Republic of legal capacity and good character over the age of 30 may become a judge of the Supreme Court. He or she must have a master’s degree in law and have passed a professional judicial examination. They are appointed without limitation of time.

Each judge of the Supreme Court is given at least one assistant. This assistant shall be appointed by the President of the Supreme Court on the proposal of the judge requesting the assistant. The assistant may be a person of good character with a master’s degree in law.

The Judicial Council serves as an advisory body to the Supreme Court. It expresses its opinion, for example, on candidates for appointment to the office of President and may ask the President of the Supreme Court to convene the plenary session and propose an agenda for its meeting. Its members are elected by the assembly of all the judges of the Supreme Court for five-year terms and are headed by the President.

Tip: Are you going to sue? Find out how much you will pay in court fees.

Supreme Court decision

As outlined in Chapter 1, the Supreme Court decides mainly on complaints for breach of law and appeals. Let’s look at these in more detail:

Complaint for breach of law

Only the Minister of Justice can lodge a complaint for breach of law against a final decision of a court or prosecutor. If you would like to file it as an accused, then you must contact the Ministry of Justice and request that the Minister himself file the complaint. You can file a complaint at any time, as there is no time limit.

The purpose of the complaint is to correct legal defects or deficiencies in the findings of fact. It is intended to remedy defects that were already present at the time the decision was taken and are therefore usually directly apparent from the case file. The Supreme Court may either dismiss the complaint or rule that there has been an infringement of the law.

In the event of a breach of the law against the accused, it will remedy the situation by annulling the decision and subsequently, for example, deciding the case itself or ordering the case to be retried by the same court or prosecutor.

Tip: Do you want to contact the Minister of Justice? Let an Accessible Advocate help you write a petition.

Appeal

An appeal may be filed by the Supreme State Prosecutor or by the accused through his/her counsel in the event that the court’s decision is incorrect. It may be lodged in the case of final decisions of the court at second instance, but only on the grounds laid down by law. It must be lodged within two months of the delivery of the court’s decision.

The Supreme Court may reject the appeal on formal grounds or dismiss it if it finds it to be without merit. Alternatively, it may find the appeal to be well-founded and annul the contested decision. It may then decide the case itself or order a new hearing and decision. In addition, it may itself add the missing operative part or order it to be completed without setting aside the contested decision.

Tip: When can an appeal be used in civil proceedings? Find out in our article.

Case law of the Supreme Court

As the Supreme Court makes decisions, case law emerges. A case law is a designation for a judicial decision and important case law is subsequently made into case law. Thus, case law is a collection of court decisions that interpret and apply legal norms to specific cases. These decisions shape the rules and principles that are applied to other court decisions. Case law is therefore an important source of law because it provides practical examples of how legal rules are applied in specific situations and how they can be interpreted.

The case law of the Supreme Court is particularly important because it is intended to ensure a uniform interpretation of the law. This means that Supreme Court decisions serve as an important source of interpretation of legal rules and principles to be applied by lower courts. It thus contributes to legal certainty and consistency in the legal environment.

Tip: All Supreme Court decisions can be found on the Supreme Court’s website nsoud.

Summary

The Supreme Court sits at the top of the judicial pyramid and decides on extraordinary appeals such as appeals and complaints for breach of the law. It also plays a key role in unifying case law, ensuring consistent legal interpretation across the lower courts. The structure of the court is divided into two chambers – the Civil and Commercial Chamber and the Criminal Chamber. The judges of the Supreme Court have high qualification requirements and their decisions shape the case law, which is a key source of law.

Are you solving a similar problem?

Dostupný advokát team of online lawyers will solve it for you.

Appeal or constitutional complaint

Has the court ruled against you and do you want to fight it? We will assess your chances of success and take care of preparing an appeal, appeal or constitutional complaint depending on the proceedings and their stage.

Preset Prices
All services pre-priced for no surprises.
We Do Everything Online
Save time, money and the hassle of travel.
We Work Fast
90 % of issues get solved by the following day.
Experienced Team
We have specialists for every field of law.

Has this content helped you? Give it a rating

Current rating: 1
Rated 48 times

Author of the article

JUDr. Ondřej Preuss, Ph.D.

Ondřej is the attorney who came up with the idea of providing legal services online. He's been earning his living through legal services for more than 10 years. He especially likes to help clients who may have given up hope in solving their legal issues at work, for example with real estate transfers or copyright licenses.

Education
  • Law, Ph.D, Pf UK in Prague
  • Law, L’université Nancy-II, Nancy
  • Law, Master’s degree (Mgr.), Pf UK in Prague
  • International Territorial Studies (Bc.), FSV UK in Prague

Reviews of the Dostupný advokát service

Recenze služby

Tomáš Hrdlička, Nové Strašecí

I felt very uncomfortable meeting an attorney in person. But Dostupný advokát managed to solve everything for me online. I bought a consultation because my employer had sent me for a long term business trip to an exotic country with no explanation, and I wanted to be sure what my rights in this situation were. The Skype consultation was very pleasant and the service was fast. I can fully recommend them.

Recenze služby

Ms Magic, Google reviews

Fast and professional solutions for most normal legal needs at affordable, preset prices. Seriously, what could be better than that? While it sounds ‘too good to be true,’ I’m happy to report that the staff at DA are pros, and what’s more they are honestly dedicated to their awesome mission, which is to make quality Fast and professional solutions for most normal legal needs at affordable, preset prices. Seriously, what could be better than that? While it sounds ‘too good to be true,’ I’m happy to report that the staff at DA are pros, and what’s more they are honestly dedicated to their awesome mission, which is to make quality legal services affordable for the average person. I find their prices very fair when compared to what I’ve usually paid for similar services, which means I (and my family and friends) can get the legal help I need without worrying about some black hole of never-ending fees. In my own experience with DA I’ve found everyone there very responsive, and emails and calls are answered in a timely manner. Their large staff also gives me confidence that any legal needs I have can be handled professionally, as there’s always someone with experience in my particular issue. Their head attorney also writes a regular blog and keeps up with all the latest legal trends, which means they as a business stay up-to-date. As someone who’s spent a fortune over the years on legal assistance, or tried to “go it alone” when I couldn’t afford legal help, I wish Dostupny Advokat had been around a long time ago. I highly encourage anyone who needs legal help to TRY THEM FIRST!

Recenze služby
Fitness Center Manager

Zuzana Marková, Prague

We had terms and conditions drafted for our gym, and now we are very glad that we did so. Clear relationship rules are the basis for lasting friendships, and never more so than in the business world!

View All Testimonials

You could also be interested in

About us in public media
Logo Česká advokátní komora Logo Advokátní kancelář roku 2023 a 2024
Follow the news
Facebook Dostupný advokát Twitter / X Dostupný advokát