Supreme Court: execution stopped for lack of results can be proposed again

Mgr. Nikola Šedová
12. March 2026
2 minutes of reading
2 minutes of reading
Debts, foreclosures and insolvency

The Supreme Court confirmed that the termination of the execution for lack of results does not in itself prevent the filing of a new enforcement petition under the same enforcement title against the same debtor. The debtor does not have to allege new facts about the debtor’s property, but must, at the request of the enforcement officer, deposit a reasonable advance on the costs of enforcement.

A legal sentence on this issue was approved by the Civil and Commercial Chamber of the Supreme Court at a hearing on 11 February 2026. According to the sentence, the creditor may file a new enforcement application even if the previous enforcement proceedings between the same parties have been discontinued due to futility pursuant to Article 55(7) to (13) of the Enforcement Procedure Code. The success of the new application cannot be conditioned on the creditor submitting new information about the debtor’s financial circumstances.

At the same time, the Supreme Court emphasised that the law deals with fruitless executions in such a way that after six years without recovery of at least the amount covering the costs of the execution and without the property being affected, the execution may be discontinued. However, according to the court, the text of the law does not imply a prohibition to commence the execution again; on the contrary, this corresponds to Section 90(3) of the Execution Code, which provides for a deposit for the costs of the execution in such cases. The creditor may thus file a new execution, but bears the risk that even repeated enforcement will not be successful.

The decision arose from a dispute over a claim of the Brno-Královo Pole municipal district in the amount of CZK 125,484 with accessories, which had already been awarded in 2006. The lower courts concluded that no further application was admissible after the original execution had been terminated for lack of result. The Supreme Court rejected this interpretation, stating that the previous lack of success did not create an obstacle to a final judgment and that the debtor’s financial circumstances may change over time. In practice, this is an important conclusion, especially for public creditors who deal with a large number of long outstanding debts.

Article topic:

Share article


Are you solving a similar problem?

Solutions Tailored for You

Our team of experienced attorneys will help you solve any legal issue. Within 24 hours we’ll evaluate your situation and suggest a step-by-step solution, including all costs. The price for this proposal is only CZK 690, and this is refunded to you when you order service from us.

I Need help

We can also solve your legal problem

In person and online. Just choose the appropriate service or opt for an independent consultation when you are unsure.

Google reviews
4.9
Facebook reviews
5.0
5 200+ people follow our Facebook
140+ people follow our X account (Twitter)
210+ people follow our LinkedIn
 
We can discuss your problem online and in person

You can find us in 8 cities

Quick contacts

+420 246 045 055
(Mo–Fri: 8—18)
We regularly comment on events and news for the media