What is the range of punishments that judges realistically use and can they predict the punishment for a particular crime? When is it possible to impose a suspended sentence and when, on the contrary, do they reach for the highest penalties?
What is the range of punishments that judges realistically use and can they predict the punishment for a particular crime? When is it possible to impose a suspended sentence and when, on the contrary, do they reach for the highest penalties?
Penalties in the Czech Republic are regulated by the Criminal Code, which describes the offence. For example, for the offence of rape, the first paragraph of Section 185 of the Criminal Code states that the penalty is imprisonment for six months to five years. But why do most perpetrators of this offence walk away from court with probation, and in which cases can the perpetrator “get away with”, say, seven years in prison? Or how is it possible that the perpetrator of a particular offence receives a sentence of community service, even though this is not mentioned as a possibility in the relevant section at all? A closer knowledge of the criminal law and the principles of punishment will provide the answer.
Tip: If you are interested in the different types of crimes, their division and statute of limitations, then read our article.
According to legal theory,punishment or sanction has a specific purpose or meaning, according to which we distinguish its several functions:
In an ideal world, all the functions of punishment would be applied in the imposition of a sentence, but this is not always possible. Often the original state cannot be restored when, for example, harm to life or limb has occurred. Educating the offender cannot always be guaranteed either. However, the courts should come as close as possible to fulfilling these functions. It is therefore necessary to consider very carefully all the circumstances of the case and to get to know the personality of the offender and to impose a punishment that is truly ‘tailored’ to the situation. On the surface, it may sometimes appear that two completely different sentences are being imposed for two identical offences, but this may not be the case at all.
Do you need help in criminal proceedings?
Are you unhappy with the outcome of the court proceedings and would like to appeal the verdict, or are you looking for a reliable lawyer to stand up for your rights in a criminal case? Contact us. We will conduct a careful analysis of your case and take care of the preparation of a pre-suit demand, a lawsuit, an appeal or straight representation in court,
When imposing a sentence, mitigating circumstances (e.g. committing the act under duress or in repelling an attack) and, conversely, aggravating circumstances (e.g. committing the act out of racial or religious hatred or in a brutal or torturous manner) are also taken into account. Committing the offence in a crisis situation or natural disaster is also considered an aggravating circumstance, which would undoubtedly apply to sentences in a state of emergency, repeatedly declared in recent times.
The basic premise, of course, is that a judge may only impose a sentence that is prescribed by law. Creativity and inventing one’s own original punishments is therefore obviously not in order, however much more interesting journalistic reports from courtrooms might be.
As a rule, the individual offences described in the criminal law have the lightest possible variant of the offence described in the first paragraph, for which the lowest penalty is imposed. In the following paragraphs, the severity of the conduct and the amount of the penalty increases.
Tip: Also familiarize yourself with circumstances that preclude illegality – situations in which criminal conduct is normally legal.
Courts in the Czech Republic are currently allowed to impose the following types of sentences:
The Czech Republic has not allowed the death penalty since 1990 .
Under Czech law, if an offender commits several offences at the same time, the individual sentences are not added together, but the criminal rate of the most severely punished offence is taken into account and a cumulative sentence is imposed. The other offences are then treated as aggravating circumstances. The opposite approach has been taken by legislators in America, for example, where individual sentences are cumulative. This may appear to be the right course of action for some particularly despicable offenders, but on the other hand, it sometimes leads to absurd situations such as 126 years’ imprisonment or even 80 life sentences.
Another situation, however, is when a so-called joint sentence is imposed, where there is a continuation of one offence. In such a case, judges have the difficult situation of having to assess whether there has been a repetition of the same offence or whether the intention of one offence was clearly established from the outset. For example, a burglar may, quite by chance, have the opportunity to steal from the same house a month apart and there will be two separate thefts; on the other hand, it is possible to imagine an intention to rob a company account, but this will be carried out gradually, by ‘siphoning off’ small sums. In the latter case, however, it would just be a continuation of one offence.
Tip: We have discussed the continuation of the offence in more detail in our article.
Courts can impose a sentence unconditionally, which means that it is carried out immediately after the judgment becomes final, for example when the convicted person starts serving a prison sentence in the relevant prison on a certain date.
Conversely, suspended prisonsentences may be imposed for less serious offences. Although the court will pass the sentence, it will suspend the execution of the sentence on condition that the convict “mows the latin”, i.e. behaves properly, during the specified period. Only imprisonment not exceeding three years can be suspended. In accordance with the purpose of the sentence as stated above, the courts will do so if it appears more likely that the offender’s previous orderly life has been an aberration and the execution of the sentence is unnecessary in view of the circumstances and the offender’s personality.
The level of sentences may also be influenced to some extent by the social climate which makes certain offences seen as less serious. This may also be the reason for the already mentioned fact that almost half of rape offenders go home from court with only a suspended sentence, even though the most serious possible course for this offence allows for up to 18 years’ imprisonment.
Tip: A very interesting application that can show us how offenders are punished by the Czech courts is the How We Punish page. It is based on statistics from the Ministry of Justice and allows us to quantify what punishments are imposed for individual crimes. It also shows how sentences differ for first offences and repeat offences and how they differ for men and women, for example.
The Criminal Law also allows judges to waive the punishment of an offender under certain conditions. This can be done, for example, in the case of negligent offences where the offender regrets the act and shows a desire to make amends. In the case of a sentence already being served, half of the sentence may be waived on request if the offender fulfils the conditions laid down by law. In the case of imprisonment, account shall be taken of behaviour in prison, fulfilment of obligations and the guarantee of a proper life and reform in the future.
Need help with filing a lawsuit or representing yourself in court? Whether the litigation is just beginning or the case is well underway, we can help you with everything. We will conduct a thorough analysis, assess your realistic chances and suggest a course of action. All this within 48 hours of ordering our services.