What to do if you disagree with the care allowance awarded in 2026?

Quick summary

• Disagreement with the level of care allowance awarded can be resolved by appeal and, where appropriate, by administrative action.
• The most common problem is that the assessment does not reflect the actual amount of help the person needs.
• It is not just the diagnosis that is crucial, but the impact of the condition on coping with the basic needs of life.
• In 2026, it is a good idea to keep an eye not only on the time limits but also on the actual benefit amounts and the correct documentation of the medical condition.
• A well-prepared submission is often based on medical reports, a functional description of limitations, and an accurate rebuttal of the conclusions of the assessment.

If you disagree with the care allowance awarded, you can appeal the decision. The general appeal period is 15 days from the notification of the decision and the Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs decides on the appeal against the decision of the regional branch of the Labour Office. If you are unsuccessful in your appeal, you can take an administrative action to the regional court, usually within 2 months of receiving the appeal decision. Good medical reports, descriptions of the actual extent of care and notification of discrepancies between reality and the assessment are key.

Need help with an appeal or administrative action? Legal review of the decision and preparation of an appeal or lawsuit offers the best solution, especially if the opinion does not match the actual medical condition.

Applying for an allowance

Mrs. Klara takes care of her father, who is 86 years old. He suffers from a serious form of diabetes and had to have his leg amputated. Dad is basically permanently bedridden. A rehabilitation nurse comes to visit him, and with the help of relatives he moves longer distances with a mechanical wheelchair, taking a few steps around the bed with the support of an adult and a French cane. He also needs help from his daughter or other relatives for basic hygiene, meal preparation and other routine activities. The prognosis for her health is uncertain. The father has been fitted with a prosthesis, but due to the poorly healing wound it is not suitable for him and rehabilitation with it is now impossible.

On the advice of a nurse, they applied for a care allowance. This is generally intended for people over one year of age whose long-term adverse health condition requires the care of another person to manage the basic needs of life.

The allowance is provided on the basis of the Social Services Act and the implementing decree. Its amount is graded according to whether the dependency is mild, moderate, severe or total dependency on another person, and an adult may be granted an allowance of between CZK 1 300 and CZK 27 000 per month according to the dependency, with CZK 27 000 for Grade IV+ (total dependency with care outside residential services, i.e. typically in the home environment); in Grade IV it is CZK 23 000.

With her help, Klára’s father, Mr Antonín, wrote an application for a care allowance, which he submitted to the relevant office of the Labour Office of the Czech Republic according to his place of residence. The process was a little more complicated than he had anticipated. First, he was contacted by a social worker, with whom he arranged a visit for the following week. The social worker spent a total of about 40 minutes in the home. She looked around the flat, the bedroom and the bathroom and checked with questions whether Mr Antonín was able to prepare his own food, what his options were in terms of hygiene, dressing, whether he was able to get himself to the door, call for help, etc. Mr Antonín replied that he was unable to do most of the things himself, as he was practically bedridden. All the time the social worker took notes and at the end of the visit she said that she was passing on the findings of the investigation to the doctor for assessment.

Approximately three weeks later, a decision arrived for Mr Antonín, awarding him the lowest level of care allowance – i.e. light dependency. The decision described the general condition of a lower limb amputation, where rehabilitation, the use of a prosthesis and then the patient’s almost complete self-sufficiency were expected. However, the applicant’s advanced age was allegedly taken into account, among other things, and for that reason the allowance was granted at all.

Appealing against a decision on care allowance

If your claim for care allowance is rejected or awarded at a lower level than you expected, you can appeal under the Administrative Procedure Code. You have 15 days to appeal. On the 15th day you can still submit your appeal at the post office.

Although you direct the appeal to the Labour Office of the Czech Republic, its processing falls under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs, which will receive the entire file within 30 days of receipt of the appeal (unless it proceeds by self-medication)

How to formulate an appeal?

First of all, identify yourself (i.e. the person who applied for the care allowance) in your appeal. Give your name, surname, date of birth and place of residence or other address for service. Identify the decision you are appealing against (who made it, when it was made and the reference number) and describe why you disagree with the decision and what you are proposing (for example, that the findings do not correspond to reality and that you are asking for an increase in the allowance). If you can attach evidence, please do so. This could be, for example, medical reports confirming the actual state of health and the prognosis for the future. Do not forget to sign the appeal.

From our law practice

In similar cases, clients most often turn to us when they have already received a negative or understated decision and feel that the authorities have mainly considered the diagnosis on paper, not the real day-to-day life. Typically, we deal with situations where an elderly person who has suffered an injury or amputation, although formally “has rehabilitation potential”, in reality cannot manage mobility, hygiene, dressing or health care without help.

Our work then usually consists of having the family describe a typical day in detail, reviewing medical records, and comparing the findings of the assessment with what the law assesses as basic living needs. Often it turns out that a key specialist report was missing from the proceedings or the prognosis was not adequately described. This is often the difference between failure and a submission that has a real chance of changing the outcome.

Let us help you too – the legal assessment of a care allowance decision and the preparation of an appeal or administrative claim makes sense, particularly if you don’t want to miss the deadline or are unsure how to properly document the actual extent of care.

Mr Antonín himself filed an appeal, but did not raise any new facts and the appeal was dismissed. He therefore contacted our legal services through his daughter to ask if anything more could be done in the case.

Filing an administrative action

Another defence in such a case is to bring an action in the administrative courts. This can only be brought once an appeal has been exhausted. An administrative action must be brought before the regional court in whose district the claimant resides or is present. The time-limit of two months from the date of service of the decision against which the action is brought must be complied with. In general, the proceedings on the action are subject to a court fee of CZK 3 000 (but individual fee exemptions are possible)

It is not necessary to be represented by a lawyer in court proceedings, but it is certainly advisable to at least consult with a lawyer and prepare the application. By drafting the claim correctly, your chances of success are significantly increased and in such a case you can recover the costs of the lawyer within a month.

An administrative action is formally similar to a previous appeal. It must be clear what it is about, who is making it, who made the decision it relates to and what is being proposed. A copy of the contested decision is attached.

We had Mrs. Klara describe her father’s health again and compared it with the table that is also used by reviewing doctors. It describes ten basic needs of life, including: mobility, orientation, communication, eating, dressing and putting on shoes, physical hygiene, performing physiological needs, health care, personal activities, and household care. If three to four of these needs are unmanaged, the first level of allowance is eligible, if 5-6 it is the second level, the third level has 7-8 and the fourth level, i.e. full dependence, implies 9-10 unmanaged needs.

In the administrative action, we described the discrepancies between the actual condition and the assessment and had Mr. Antonin’s physician explicitly confirm the medical prognosis with respect to his age. In practice, there can be a diametric difference in the rehabilitation of a thirty-year-old athlete who has had his leg amputated and a nearly ninety-year-old gentleman with diabetes and other ailments following the same medical procedure. But according to the opinion, this was not taken into account.

Judgment of the Administrative Court

The Administrative Court does not decide what level of care allowance will be awarded. The court will only confirm or annul the decision of the administrative authority by judgment (or, if the action is not well-founded, the court will dismiss it). If the decision is annulled, the matter is then heard again by the Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs, which is bound by the legal opinion of the regional court.

The Regional Court overturned the decision of the Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs and the Ministry decided in the new hearing to grant the benefit in stage III where the dependency is severe. Mr. Antonín was able to include additional paid labour in his care, thus relieving Ms. Klara of her responsibilities.

Summary

Disagreeing with an award of care allowance is not the end of the matter. If the decision does not reflect the actual medical condition and the extent of help needed, the first step is a well prepared appeal. It needs to be specific, based on medical reports and focused on which basic needs of life the person cannot manage. If you are unsuccessful in the appeal process, an administrative appeal to the regional court is the next step.

This must be based on the current wording of the Social Services Act. It is in these cases that detail is often crucial: one missing medical report, inaccurate description of daily care or missed deadline can mean that a family will receive less support than it is entitled to in the long term. That’s why it makes sense to resolve the dispute early and with a well-prepared argument.