Logo Advokátní kancelář roku 2023

Execution by deductions from wages and other income

Execution on the debtor’s income is one of the first options that bailiffs focus on. What income, other than wages or salary, can be affected? What is the minimum amount that will be left for the debtor and his/her family, and what is the procedure in the event of multiple foreclosures?

žena má zablokovaný účet, exekuce na mzdu
8 minutes of reading

Chapters of the article

The idea of someone “arbitrarily” taking a portion of my wages is probably not the most appealing, but within the options offered by law, garnishment by deduction from wages is still a relatively benign option. This form of garnishment in the law comes right after garnishment of a debt from a bank account, or in the vernacular, attachment of an account. This is the order given by law, which the bailiff must respect.

Are you dealing with a legal problem related to foreclosure?

Describe your problem to us and within 48 hours you will have a response from one of our attorneys.

What income can be used for execution?

The main income targeted for execution is, of course, wages or salary. It is essentially the same, i.e. a monetary benefit provided for work by an employer, with the difference that salary is paid to employees of the state, municipalities or contributory organisations, while wages are paid to employees of private employers. The calculation is made on the entire net salary, including bonuses. However, the net wage does not include the tax bonus, as well as travel allowances or compensation for wear and tear on own tools or equipment.

In addition to salary or wages, other types of income for work (such as activities under various agreements) or income that replaces or is provided in addition to wages (such as sick pay or maternity pay) can also be covered.

Under the law , all such income may be affected:

  • wages or salary,
  • remuneration from an employment agreement or from an agreement for the performance of work,
  • remuneration for work or on-call duty,
  • remuneration of members of local government councils,
  • state social assistance benefits – this may include child benefit, housing benefit or parental allowance. Benefits that are provided on a one-off basis, such as birth or funeral allowances, cannot be affected.
  • foster care benefits – such as an allowance to cover the child’s needs or a foster carer’s fee. Non-recurrent benefits, such as child adoption allowance, foster care termination allowance, motor vehicle purchase allowance.
  • wage or salarycompensation – i.e. holiday pay, pay for obstructions to work, holiday pay, etc., with the exception of the above,
  • sick pay,
  • maternity allowance,
  • pensions – old-age, invalidity, widow’s or widower’s and orphan’s pensions,
  • scholarships,
  • unemployment benefit or retraining allowance,
  • severance pay or similar benefits provided in connection with the termination of employment, service or public office,
    cash benefits of a loyalty or stabilisation nature granted in connection with employment,
  • compensation for loss of earnings during temporary incapacity for work and compensation for loss of earnings after the end of temporary incapacity for work,
    benefits resulting from an exchange contract under the Civil Code,
  • the retirement allowance for members of the armed forces or security forces,
  • wage claims under the law governing the protection of employees in the event of the employer’s insolvency.

Tip: We have discussed how to prevent foreclosure in our separate article.

How much is the non-forfeitable amount?

The total uncollectible amount of a particular debtor is a certain amount of money that can never be deducted. It is calculated as the sum of the uncollectible amount for the debtor himself and all uncollectible amounts for dependents. It may therefore be slightly different for everyone depending on their family circumstances.

According to the Ministry of Justice, it is:

  • the non-forfeitable amount for the debtor alone CZK 9138,75
  • the non-forfeitable amount per dependent CZK 3046,25

However, this does not mean that this non-forfeitable amount is set and the rest of the salary goes to pay the debts. The reality is a bit more complicated.

The principle of deductions from wages is based on a one-third system. If there are multiple debts and garnishments, then the first third of the debtor’snet wages is used to satisfy the creditors’ non-priority claims. The second third is then used to satisfy the so-called priority claims of the beneficiary, and if this is insufficient, the first thirds can also be satisfied. The third third of the debtor’s net wages, together with the non-forfeitable amount, remains with the debtor.

Thepriority debts to be satisfied in the context of enforcement are mainly maintenance, and then, for example, compensation for personal injury, tax debts, health or social insurance debts, compensation for damage caused by intentional crime, etc.

Non-priority debts are various fines for illegal driving, unpaid loans, unpaid electricity, gas or other utility bills, etc.
It is only the sum of the uncollectible amounts plus at least one-third or even two-thirds of the remainder of the net wages (if deducted for non-priority claims) that remain after deducting the uncollectible amounts that constitute the debtor’s total uncollectible minimum.

To shed more light on the whole system, let us take an example:

Ms Alena had an unpaid debt for her phone with the operator, which she had not paid and which had grown into a foreclosure. Ms Alena is single and has one dependent child. She still receives maintenance for him in the amount of CZK 3 000, but he is not subject to execution. We therefore count one amount per debtor and one per dependent within the non-forfeitable amounts. Mrs Alena’s net salary is CZK 27 000. The execution relates to an unpaid debt with the operator, i.e. a non-priority claim.
The amount to be seized for the debtor is CZK 9138,75, plus CZK 3046,25 for the dependent. This brings the total amount of the non-chargeable amounts to CZK 12 185. After subtracting the total amount of the uncollectible amount from the net salary on which the deductions are calculated, this leaves CZK 14 815.

This amount is divided into three thirds of CZK 4,938, leaving CZK 1. Since only one third of the remainder of the net wages is deducted for the non-preferential claim, that leaves Mrs Alice with two thirds of the remainder of the net wages, so 2 × CZK 4938, and a total non-deductible amount of CZK 12 185 and CZK 1, making a total of CZK 22 062, which must not be deducted from Mrs Alice’s net wages.

Tip: to calculate garnishment by deduction from your wages, you may find a calculator on the internet useful.

In order to protect debtors from hitting rock bottom, the so-called protected account has been introduced. Debtors who have more than one execution and who also have a bank account attached can now set up a protected account so that the remaining part of their salary, the so-called non-forfeitable amount, can be sent to their account and they can still dispose of the funds. The money cannot then be withdrawn from this account because of the execution.

What about garnishment of income for self-employed persons?

Since the self-employed person generally does not have one main source of income, but has it scattered among many entities and usually over the course of a month, it is much easier to execute an execution by attaching the account. In official terminology, this means attaching a debt. In such a case, the court will order the bank not to allow the debtor to withdraw or transfer money up to the amount of the debt to be recovered. The bailiff will first warn the bank and then the debtor so that the money cannot be withdrawn quickly. The account is then blocked for at least 30 days, after which the bank is not allowed to do anything with the money in case, for example, the execution is stopped. After that, if there is enough money in the account, the bank sends it to the bailiff. Otherwise, the whole anabasis takes much longer. The rule is that when the account is seized, the debtor must always have three times the minimum subsistence level left, which the debtor is allowed to withdraw in one lump sum. Currently, this amount is CZK 12 750.

However, if such an option is not an option for some reason, or if it covers only part of the debts, the entrepreneur’s income can also be targeted. Especially in the case of a self-employed person operating under the so-called shvarcsystem, deductions can be applied with ease. However, there are a few differences compared to deductions from wages:

  • Deductions are calculated on the invoiced amount (not the equivalent of net wages),
  • there is no non-deductible minimum per person and per dependent,
  • income is divided into fifths.

The debtor (entrepreneur) is then left with 3/5 of the gross income provided that non-priority claims are satisfied in the execution and 2/5 of the gross income if priority claims are satisfied in the execution.

If the above-mentioned Ms Alena worked as a self-employed person and her income was CZK 27,000, then she would be left with CZK 16,200 under the enforcement of non-priority claims, which would be a relatively significant disadvantage compared to the situation where she was employed.

Are you solving a similar problem?

Dostupný advokát team of online lawyers will solve it for you.

Consultation with a lawyer

Looking for an answer to a specific legal question? Email us and you will have an answer from one of our attorneys within 48 hours. We have specialists in all areas of law and guarantee the high level of expertise of our attorneys.

Preset Prices
All services pre-priced for no surprises.
We Do Everything Online
Save time, money and the hassle of travel.
We Work Fast
90 % of issues get solved by the following day.
Experienced Team
We have specialists for every field of law.

Has this content helped you? Give it a rating

No rating yet. Be first to rate and help others.

Article topic:

Author of the article

JUDr. Ondřej Preuss, Ph.D.

Ondřej is the attorney who came up with the idea of providing legal services online. He's been earning his living through legal services for more than 10 years. He especially likes to help clients who may have given up hope in solving their legal issues at work, for example with real estate transfers or copyright licenses.

Education
  • Law, Ph.D, Pf UK in Prague
  • Law, L’université Nancy-II, Nancy
  • Law, Master’s degree (Mgr.), Pf UK in Prague
  • International Territorial Studies (Bc.), FSV UK in Prague

Reviews of the Dostupný advokát service

Recenze služby

Ms Magic, Google reviews

before 3 years

Fast and professional solutions for most normal legal needs at affordable, preset prices. Seriously, what could be better than that? While it sounds ‘too good to be true,’ I’m happy to report that the staff at DA are pros, and what’s more they are honestly dedicated to their awesome mission, which is to make quality (zobrazit více) Fast and professional solutions for most normal legal needs at affordable, preset prices. Seriously, what could be better than that? While it sounds ‘too good to be true,’ I’m happy to report that the staff at DA are pros, and what’s more they are honestly dedicated to their awesome mission, which is to make quality legal services affordable for the average person. I find their prices very fair when compared to what I’ve usually paid for similar services, which means I (and my family and friends) can get the legal help I need without worrying about some black hole of never-ending fees. In my own experience with DA I’ve found everyone there very responsive, and emails and calls are answered in a timely manner. Their large staff also gives me confidence that any legal needs I have can be handled professionally, as there’s always someone with experience in my particular issue. Their head attorney also writes a regular blog and keeps up with all the latest legal trends, which means they as a business stay up-to-date. As someone who’s spent a fortune over the years on legal assistance, or tried to “go it alone” when I couldn’t afford legal help, I wish Dostupny Advokat had been around a long time ago. I highly encourage anyone who needs legal help to TRY THEM FIRST!

Recenze služby

Jan Vrátný, Veselí nad Lužnicí

before 3 years

I work as a self-employed craftsman and I know my field very well. Unexpected events happen, however, and I sometimes have to deal with problems where I need quality legal advice. I don’t like calling legal offices, getting sucked into discussions with terms I don’t understand. Dostupnyadvokat.cz is different. My first time, they replied immediately (zobrazit více) and together we created a contract custom tailored to my exact needs. I continue to be very happy with both their work and their price.

Recenze služby

Zuzana Marková, Prague

before 3 years

We had terms and conditions drafted for our gym, and now we are very glad that we did so. Clear relationship rules are the basis for lasting friendships, and never more so than in the business world!

View All Testimonials

You could also be interested in

About us in public media
Logo Česká advokátní komora Logo Advokátní kancelář roku 2023
Follow the news
Facebook Dostupný advokát Twitter / X Dostupný advokát